top of page
  • tedcap

2024: Highlighting the unseen risks amongst global trends.

When engaging in risk analysis, it is crucial not only to identify and comprehend existing risks but also to anticipate how subtle undercurrents within various domains can evolve into full-fledged risk scenarios. Risks are not static; they are dynamic entities influenced by a myriad of interconnected factors. Understanding this dynamism involves not just recognizing the evident threats but also discerning the latent forces that have the potential to manifest as significant risks.

Existing risks are often visible and well-documented, drawing attention to immediate concerns and vulnerabilities. These risks can be assessed based on historical data, current trends, and observable patterns. However, the landscape of risks is continually shaped by complex interactions among social, economic, political, and environmental elements.

The undercurrents represent the subtle, less conspicuous forces operating beneath the surface. These can include shifting societal attitudes, evolving technological landscapes, geopolitical tensions, or even gradual environmental changes. While not immediately apparent, these undercurrents have the potential to gain strength and transform into explicit risk scenarios.

As we explore the current scenario, financial risks arising from the decentralization of the dollar, environmental risks linked to climate change, and political and sociocultural risks resulting from polarizations constitute the foundational risks.

Foundational risks, in the realm of risk analysis, are fundamental factors that underpin and give rise to a spectrum of potential threats and uncertainties. These risks are considered the core elements or starting points that have the capacity to trigger and influence various other risks across different domains.

It is imperative to dissect the risk landscape, delving into both the evident trends shaping the global sphere and the subtle undercurrents that could evolve into unforeseen risks throughout the year.

Clear trends:

Electoral Tsunami

Too much power for one person to hold.

Over 2 billion people – a quarter of the world’s population – will be affected by elections in 2024, including in the US, EU, UK, Taiwan, India and Russia. Also in the Dominican Republic, where TEDCAP headquarters are located. Some will have significant global implications, though in many cases the full effects will not play through until 2025.

The electoral tsunami unfolds against a backdrop of heightened global tensions, with ongoing conflicts such as Russia's invasion of Ukraine and renewed strife in the Middle East. The geopolitical standoff between China and the US adds complexity, raising concerns about potential disruptions tied to elections in key nations.

This is why, on the top of the Global Risks Report of 2024 for the Wolrd Economic Forum, “Misinformation and disinformation” is at the top of their concerns.

Misinformation and disinformation campaigns can erode public trust in electoral systems. False narratives about election rigging, tampering with voting results, or doubts about the integrity of electoral institutions can lead to a loss of confidence in the democratic process. By disseminating content that reinforces existing beliefs or fosters divisions, political actors can create a fragmented social landscape. This polarization can lead to social unrest, hinder constructive political discourse, and make it challenging to address critical issues facing the nation.

As political uncertainty looms, businesses face operational challenges stemming from the growing trend of protectionism. The prioritization of short-term electoral advantages often leads to policy incoherence, especially in critical areas like climate, tech regulation, and energy. Navigating through such uncertainties requires businesses to adopt agile strategies

Regional Conflicts

The most vulnerable people are the least protected.

A total of 183 regional and local conflicts were documented globally in 2023, marking the highest figure recorded in three decades, as reported by the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) in London. The latest edition of the IISS's annual study on armed conflicts, published this week, revealed that ongoing conflicts include those between China and Taiwan, Russia and Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh, as well as between India and Pakistan, among others. The IISS also highlighted the persistent danger that Israel's devastation of Gaza could lead to broader conflict in the Middle East.

Furthermore, the study's authors warned that "the acceleration of the climate crisis continues to act as a multiplier of both the root causes of conflicts and institutional weaknesses in fragile countries." According to the statistics, the intensity of conflicts is escalating each year, with a 14% increase in deaths and a 28% rise in violent events.

In the words of the late Henry Kissinger, “The risk of a world war is no longer limited to the potential of an incident to provoke a superpower response. Regional conflicts could escalate suddenly and without warning into a world war, drawing nations into a spreading confrontation."

The ever-advancing landscape of technology introduces its own set of risks. Concerns about cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and the weaponization of emerging technologies such as drones, lasers and bioweapons create a complex risk environment. The potential for state-sponsored cyber-attacks, misinformation campaigns, and the misuse of technological advancements for malicious purposes pose threats of a global Cold War that would throw the world into disarray.

Next Pandemic

Did we really learn from Covid or are we going down the same path?

The looming threat of another pandemic is underscored by the relentless evolution of pathogens and the interconnectedness of our globalized world. The recent COVID-19 pandemic highlights the imperative for a vigilant and proactive approach rooted in scientific insights.

Potential scenarios for the next pandemic vary, from a highly transmissible respiratory virus to the reemergence of a known pathogen with enhanced virulence. Zoonotic spillover, antimicrobial resistance, and global travel patterns contribute to vulnerabilities. Scientific modeling indicates a dynamic risk landscape, necessitating constant surveillance and adaptable response strategies.

Beyond viral pandemics, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses an equally pressing threat. Overuse and misuse of antibiotics contribute to the rise of resistant strains, potentially rendering current antibiotics ineffective. Mitigating AMR demands responsible antibiotic use, surveillance, and the development of novel antimicrobial agents.

Unseen Undercurrents:

The End of the Internet: Inversion

Humanity is on the verge of digital slavery at the hands of AI .

We’re living in a world where Instagram influencers boast millions of followers, mostly made up of Russian bots, and AI virtual influencers can also be found raking in millions. Non-humans are also snatching up concert tickets, making it feel like we're up against an ever-growing silent zombie horde of online bots.

The internet, once seen as a vibrant space for human interaction, is increasingly dominated by bots, according to the latest data from Imperva's Bad Bot Report for 2022. It turns out that almost half of all online traffic, a whopping 47.4%, is generated by these automated entities rather than actual people.

This revelation brings to light the 'dead internet theory,' previously dismissed as a conspiracy, now becoming a significant aspect of our daily online experiences. The unsettling truth is that we may be interacting with machines rather than humans, prompting concerns about the authenticity of our digital interactions. High-profile figures like Elon Musk have raised doubts about the integrity of platforms like Twitter, hinting that a large portion of their 'users' may, in fact, be bots. Some experts even go so far as to suggest that up to 80% of Twitter accounts might lack genuine human users.

The Dead Internet theory, if proven true, jeopardizes the fragile commodity of trust in the digital age. If users start believing that most online content is generated by bots and manipulated algorithms, it erodes the credibility of digital spaces. This loss of trust has broad consequences, impacting individuals and undermining the foundations of online communities, social platforms, and digital institutions, fostering widespread skepticism and uncertainty.

Proponents of this theory suggest that, instead of being predominantly driven by genuine human activity, the internet is now characterized by a significant presence of bots and automatically generated content. This inversion implies a shift where artificial entities, rather than organic users, take the lead in shaping online interactions and content. The theory posits that algorithms designed to curate and recommend content may prioritize and amplify this automated activity, overshadowing authentic human engagement.

Although the internet is increasingly saturated with bots, scammers, and counterfeit profiles, many still perceive every online interaction as 'genuine.' But there is no avoiding the fact that the digital landscape is now littered with bots, disinformation tactics, echo chambers, deep fakes, fabricated accounts, and algorithms designed with inherent biases. Although content remains king, context remains everything.

Disclosure and Deception

Just because we (as in us the world) haven't found it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

The increasing disillusionment with governments, the rise of conspiracy theories, potential disclosures of UFO and whistleblowers emerging from the Military Industrial Complex collectively contribute to a complex web of societal and geopolitical risk factors.  This disillusionment is often fueled by various factors, including perceptions of corruption, ineffectiveness, or a disconnect between governing bodies and the aspirations of the populace. As citizens increasingly question the legitimacy of their leaders, this sentiment becomes a potent force shaping the societal landscape.

Simultaneously, the surge in conspiracy theories amplifies the complexity of these societal dynamics. Conspiracy theories, ranging from the plausible to the fantastical, thrive in environments where trust in traditional sources of information is eroding. Whether fueled by socio-political uncertainties or technological advancements that facilitate the rapid spread of unverified information, these theories contribute to a climate of suspicion and polarization within communities.

Adding to this intricate risk context are the potential disclosures of unidentified flying objects (UFOs). The mere possibility of revelations about encounters with unknown aerial phenomena introduces an element of uncertainty that can reverberate across multiple dimensions. From challenging established scientific paradigms to prompting existential questions about humanity's place in the cosmos, UFO disclosures can have profound societal and psychological impacts.

The geopolitical landscape is sensitive, and perceptions matter. If nations misinterpret UFO-related events as threats, we could witness a dangerous escalation of tensions. Such misunderstandings might lead to military responses, creating geopolitical crises with far-reaching implications.

As journalist and whistleblower Serge Monast warned us back in the 90s: "Project Blue Beam seeks to manipulate minds on a global scale, using advanced technology to create illusions that will shape a new world order. We must remain vigilant and question the reality presented to us."

If a worldwide UFO deception were to be exposed, the public's reactions might span from incredulity to anger, potentially culminating in civil unrest. Authorities would find themselves grappling with the Herculean task of maintaining public order and security. This, in turn, could cast a shadow over international relations, with mutual suspicion obstructing collaborative efforts. Scientific research, diplomatic initiatives, and global cooperation may bear the brunt of this strain, hampering humanity's collective ability to address shared challenges.

The act of manipulating public sentiment on such a grand scale inevitably raises profound ethical questions. The deliberate fabrication of a perceived threat for ulterior motives prompts serious moral considerations surrounding transparency, consent, and the responsibilities of those in power. Even if corrective measures are taken to rectify the global deception, the cultural trauma stemming from manipulating such a sensitive topic is likely to persist. Generations may find themselves grappling with the aftermath, scrutinizing the motives and trustworthiness of those who orchestrated the deception.

The TEDCAP Approach

The only source of knowledge is experience.

As we have said to our clients every day, getting serious about risk analysis involves a cultural shift within organizations. It means recognizing that risk management is not a one-time task but an ongoing, dynamic process. Employing cutting-edge tools and methodologies, organizations can conduct rigorous risk analyses that consider both evident and latent risks. This seriousness requires commitment at all levels, from leadership to operational teams, fostering a risk-aware culture that prioritizes resilience and adaptability.

It requires integrating risk assessment across diverse domains—financial, technological, environmental, and sociopolitical—. Rather than addressing risks in isolation, organizations can develop a unified risk management framework. This approach involves identifying cross-cutting patterns and dependencies, ensuring a more nuanced and effective response to multifaceted challenges.

The sheer volume and complexity of data in the cusp of 2024, necessitate harnessing the power of big data. By aggregating, analyzing, and extracting insights from vast datasets, organizations can uncover patterns, correlations, and early indicators of potential risks. This data-driven approach enhances decision-making precision, allowing businesses to detect emerging threats and opportunities, adapt to changing market conditions, and optimize operational efficiency.

In these uncertain and changing times, mitigation efforts should extend beyond traditional boundaries, incorporating measures to address not only the evident risks but also the subtle undercurrents that may evolve into significant threats. Businesses should prioritize agility, adaptability, and resilience, especially in the face of uncertain political landscapes and the potential for disruptions tied to global events like elections.

In the dynamic landscape of 2024, the ability to anticipate emerging risks, quickly adapt to the new necessities, and respond effectively and correctly will be the hallmark of resilient organizations.

By staying ahead of the curve, embracing innovation, and cultivating a culture of risk-aware decision-making, businesses can position themselves not only to weather uncertainties but also to thrive in an ever-evolving global landscape.

For a pdf or printed copy, please contact us.

This article is the Copyright of TEDCAP. All Rights Reserved.

If you would like to learn more or have questions about this topic, please contact us by emailing or by calling us at (+1) 212 796 2130. We are a consulting and advisory company that specialize in mitigating risk for families and companies and we would be delighted to speak with you further about how we can help you, your family, or your company.


bottom of page